In 2013 AGA/Groove inc will be switching things up!
This will be the very first time that we see Dal Classical Alice in Wonderland.
She looks so mature to me, I don’t know why that is.
Go to eBay to claim her!
She makes for a nice Alice but I’m a tad disappointing because I fell in Love with the Orthodox Alice Pullip Doll 🙁
Here is a lovely video to checkout.
Follow Alice along her journey through wonderland!
Dal – Alice
Pullip – The Clock Rabbit
Isul – The Mad Hatter
Post your opinions about this new line up below.
Do you like the new change or are you unsure about it?
I would love to hear your thoughts! 🙂
~Kat
Dal Natalie
Visit here to learn why these doll are so popular
wow, that was interesting and i must say that i do like the judge. i don’t think any one has ever considered him before n the alice in wonderland group. though i would have to sy that i would have prefered another cheshire cat instead. last years was pityful.
this in not the first dal Alice, she is Alice in the lunatic series.
Oh yeah your right 🙂 I totally forgot about her being Melancholic Alice!
I like the whole Alice in Wonderland Series ( I adore the Isul Mad Hatter :D), but the whole idea is kind of tiring.. I think they should try a new series each year, not the same exact storyline. That is just my opinion though.
I full heartedly agree, i think that each series has its best ones, like 2 years ago it was the isul white king, Taeyang mad rabbit, pink edition pullip, and this years taeyang king and isul. But it gets tiring, i think they should do a new fairytale each year, like last year it was snowwhite, this year it is cinderella. i think that would go over better
I agree with both of yall, it’s getting tiring =/
I love the idea of a new fairytale each year! That would be a really cool concept.
You would have something different to look forward to vs a remake of the Alice series each year 😛
i would love to see rapunzel or maybe of princess and the frog or! ooh… sleeping beauty. i think they could have fun with all of that. oh and i hope that the cinderella has her two sisters. i mean there isnt that many characters in the story though you can do mce as little pullips.
((maybe have byul be the ugly sisters)) no offence to those that like byul!
I would love if they made a sleeping beauty pullip series! That would be really strange if the leave out cinderella’s sisters… cause like you said there isn’t many characters in the story
yeah right? it wll be interesting if they dont. or her mother either.
Ahh your right…her evil step mother lol I kinda forgot her actually >_<
chuckles. lets see here…
cnderella, 2 step sisters, prince, fairy god mother, and evil step mother. thats a pretty good cast
haha that really is a good a cast there
and actually it can be with everyone too. pullip will have to play 2 spots though
Dal Alice is cute but I’m really not a huge fan of Dal’s face 🙁 Pullip Alice is much more beautiful <3
Hello thanks for stopping by and commenting! 🙂
Yeah, I know what you mean. The dal Alice is cute and all, but I would much prefer Pullip as Alice too.
~Kat
Dal is more suitable for a young boys face. i actually gt a dal by accident thinking it was a boy. it was coco by the way
Lol Oh no your kidding me, that’s funny xD
I can totally understand how that happened, b/c the coco dal really does have an androgynous look O.o
First ever pullip i ever got was coco yes. kept calling her my little blue boy till i found her breasts…still call her little blue boy though.
Lol that’s just too funny and cute ^_^
aww. she looks so cute. i think i may be adding her to my collection 😀
Glad to hear that you may be adding this Dal to your collection 🙂
Isnt this the…4 year in a row that we had a alice in wonderland series?
though she does look cute.
Yepyep you are 100% correct about it being the 4th year in a row for Alice in Wonderland.:)
With the grand total being 6 Alice in Wonderland Series (2004 and 2007) It’s crazy lol xD
yeah… they really need to go in a different direction. i really love the story, but not to have a new series of dolls dedicated to t every year.-.-U